New report on sprawl ranks the large metros

Thursday, December 12, 2002

A new report on sprawl ranks the largest 83 metro areas. The report, a product of three years of research by Reid Ewing of Rutgers University and Rolf Pendall of Cornell University, represents the most comprehensive effort yet undertaken to define, measure and evaluate metropolitan sprawl and its impacts.

EDPros in these large metro areas should download the report to get the latest on this emerging economic development issue. Go

Sprawl matters as an economic development issue for at least three reasons: First, sprawl tends to "hollow out" a regional economy, creating a divide between the "haves" and the "have-nots" (See Metro Politics, an excellent book by Myron Orfield on this issue.)

Second. sprawl, as Orfield points out, tends to lead to more difficult regional politics. Unless the region can take steps like Louisville to establish a regional city/county government, political consensus is more difficult to reach. (For more on Louisville, see the recent Brookings strategy report.)

Finallly, sprawl creates a higher "overhead" for an economy to support. More roads, sewer lines, public safety personnel and facilities. Pioneering studies at Rutgers in the 1990's by Robert Burchell point to a simple fact: sprawl costs more. (For more on the costs of sprawl, see this guide prepared by PlannersWeb.)

posted by Ed Morrison |

Subscribe with Bloglines






Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
links
Google
The Web EDPro Weblog