Tricky politics of regional economic development within a state

Friday, March 14, 2003

Tennessee, South Carolina, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts all have new governors, and all of them have launched initiatives to define regional objectives for economic development within their state.

Governor Bredesen in Tennessee is looking to his newly created Jobs Cabinet to define regional approaches.

In Pennsyvania, Governor Rendell started holding regional summits shortly after he got elected. He called on regional leaders to submit a "wish list" for state action.

In South Carolina, Governor Sanford is launching a regional cluster analysis with Michael Porter (due to be completed, I'm told, in the summer).

Massachusetts' Governor Mitt Romney is the only one who appears to have tripped on a few political wires. His regional economic councils are being criticized for rounding up the usual suspects ignoring some key constituencies. (That's not his only headache. Gov. Romney's proposal to restructure the Univeristiy of Massachusetts -- in order, in part, to make it more flexible for regional economic development agendas -- is being trashed as a "dismantling" of UMass. Welcome to the brass-knuckle world of Massachusetts politics.)

My bet goes on Bredesen and Rendell. They are both former mayors of big cities. They understand the complexities of identifying and integrating political agendas. For this reason, they are most likely to be successful in defining regional approaches that work.

posted by Ed Morrison |

Subscribe with Bloglines






Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
links
Google
The Web EDPro Weblog