Finding political balance in cluster strategies

Sunday, July 18, 2004

South Carolina is moving its economic development strategy aggressively toward a cluster-based approach. But one fact is clear: the approach needs to be politically balanced. In South Carolina, as in most state legislatures, the rural vote often dominates.

Rural legislators will not go along with an economic strategy that they see as benefitting only urban areas. Read more. A cluster-based approach -- which focuses on building "agglomeration economies". These clusters are inherently biased toward metro areas. So, if South Carolina pursues a cluster-based strategy alone, the state will be pouring more investment into metro areas (measured on a per capita basis).

One way out of the box: Look at dynamic strategies of rural economies in places like Western North Carolina. There, AdvantageWest is moving aggressively to build entrepreneurial networks. You can see another good example with The Appalachian Center for Economic Networks .

In rural areas, South Carolina should be focusing on building these entrepreneurial networks. That's the best way to achieve political balance. The Center for Rural Entrepreneurship is a good place to start learning about this approach.

(The worst way for South Carolina to mediate these pressures would be to carve off investment for pet projects, like spec buildings in rural counties.)

posted by Ed Morrison |

Subscribe with Bloglines






Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
links
Google
The Web EDPro Weblog