Economic development in the big city

Saturday, October 02, 2004

Economic development is often a contact sport in big cities.

Good economic development balances public participation with leadership direction. You need to design a process that includes public comments and ideas. But your process also needs clear definition and direction, if it is to lead anywhere.

Take the case of Philadelphia. The mayor recently held an economic summit to which 150 people were invited. The summit did not include the media or the general public. The mayor's economic development staff indicated that they would publish an interim report in six to eight weeks.

Not good enough, according to one member of the city council. He has gotten the city council to approve the issuance of a subpoena to get control of documents prepared for the summit.

Now move to Cleveland. Mayor Jane Campbell is trying to rally the leadership to do something about the city's dismal record on poverty. At her summit -- also an invitation only event, but open to the press -- she has organized working groups to tackle different dimensions of the problem.

Not good enough, according to a member of the city council, who plans to hold his own "grass roots" summit.

Meanwhile, in Detroit, the city council has endorsed a really bad idea: create a publicly funded development agency that would benefit only black business owners.

Read more about Philadelphia.

Read more about Cleveland.

Read more about Detroit

posted by Ed Morrison |

Subscribe with Bloglines






Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
links
Google
The Web EDPro Weblog