The problem with earmarks

Thursday, December 01, 2005

Increasingly, Congressional earmarks are being used to create anchor investments in potentially new clusters.

For example, last week, U.S. Rep. G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina announced that he had secured an earmark of $1.5 million for the Advanced Vehicle Research Center through the Energy and Water Development Appropriation for fiscal year 2006. The center will be located in rural Northampton County (pop, 21,000, near Roanoke Rapids). Read more.

In another example, a representative from North Carolina got a bunch of funding for a new center on regenerative medicine. Read more.

The trick is that politics is not a really good predictor of markets. Anchors like these need to attract private investment if they are to be sustainable. The earmark process does not provide any rational way to evaluate whether a given investment has the potential to leverage private dollars.

But Rep. Butterfield's project is chump change compared to Senator Grassley's $50 million for his indoor rain forest. Perhaps embarrassed by the scope of a project that provides $50 million in federal funds to build a rain forest in rural Coralville, Senator Grassley is proposing legislation now that requires project leaders to raise at least $50 million in private funds by December 2007 before federal funding can be used.

To give himself a little political cover, he now wants to mandate leverage. Read more.

posted by Ed Morrison |

Subscribe with Bloglines






Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
links
Google
The Web EDPro Weblog