Iowa's rain forest

Saturday, January 28, 2006

For a couple of years, we have been following the saga of the indoor rain forest in Iowa. I got steamed when Iowa's Senator Grassley stuck in a $50 million earmark to support the indoor rain forest at the same time the federal government was cutting the Manufacturing Extension Program by a similar amount. (not surprisingly, the controversy pumped up the blogoshere.

(The money for the rain forest was tucked into the Department of Energy legislation. That's the logic of earmarks.)

The Senator has since modified his position to be more sensible. He has made the $50 million contingent on a local match. I'm all for big projects. But they need to be financed locally. Federal earmarks lull us into the idea that money is "free".

The Environmental Project might be a great idea. We may need some environmental education in this country. (A new study released this week ranks the U.S. 28th in the world in environmental performance. Read more.)

But the majority of the financing should come from a combination of private financing and local taxes.

The federal government's investment -- if any in this time of record deficits-- should represent a small fraction of the total project. (Better yet, keep the federal government focused on investing in our colleges and universities.)

Here's the latest chapter. Read more.

posted by Ed Morrison |

Subscribe with Bloglines






Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
links
Google
The Web EDPro Weblog