Choices for Cleveland and Ohio

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Casinos are a twenty year old economic development strategy that does not work very well.

In rural areas close to metro regions, casinos can boost incomes. Rising Sun, Indiana next to Cincinnati is a good example.

But urban casinos are a different story. Unless they have a clear target market outside the region, their impact is more negative than positive. They also generate damaging social costs. Read more.

These issues are currently being discussed in Northeast Ohio, where I live. Today's Cleveland Plain Dealer does a good job in outlining the different perspectives on the isssues. Read more. Here's an outline of the issue.

Opponents to the Cleveland business community include the The Columbus Partnership, the Ohio State University Board of Regents, The Akron Beacon Journal, The News Herald, Senator Voinovich, and Governor Taft.

You can read more on Cleveland 2.0, a blog I set up to explore economic development alternatives for my hometown. Sadly, the casino issue is isolating Cleveland's business leadership within the state. It comes away looking self-absorbed, manipulative, greedy.

As a result, the leadership is even less effective, in my view, in helping Ohio define a productive economic development strategy around issue that really matter: education, innovation, and collaboration.

posted by Ed Morrison |

Subscribe with Bloglines






Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
links
Google
The Web EDPro Weblog